Luxembourg vs Switzerland: Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score

Luxembourg
62.82
in 2019
Switzerland
62.54
in 2019
Luxembourg rank
108th
Switzerland rank
110th

Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score over time

  • Luxembourg
  • Switzerland
0204060200520122019

How they compare

Luxembourg currently reports 62.82 against 62.54 in Switzerland, a difference of 0.28.

Across all 14 years both countries report, Luxembourg has been ahead every year.

Luxembourg ranks 108th and Switzerland ranks 110th of 188 countries.

Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Luxembourg Switzerland Difference Ahead
2000s 63.4 62.54 0.8646 Luxembourg
2010s 62.88 62.54 0.3458 Luxembourg

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score, Luxembourg or Switzerland?
Luxembourg, at 62.82 against 62.54 in Switzerland as of 2019.
What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score between Luxembourg and Switzerland?
0.28, with Luxembourg ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and Switzerland?
14 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2019.
How do Luxembourg and Switzerland rank globally for dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score?
Luxembourg ranks 108th and Switzerland ranks 110th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,783 data points, 2005–2019
Last refreshed

The score for time benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.