Micronesia (country) vs Sri Lanka: Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score
Micronesia (country)
83
in 2019
Sri Lanka
82.71
in 2019
Micronesia (country) rank
24th
Sri Lanka rank
25th
Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score over time
- Micronesia (country)
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Micronesia (country) currently reports 83 against 82.71 in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0.29.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Micronesia (country) has been ahead every year.
Micronesia (country) ranks 24th and Sri Lanka ranks 25th of 188 countries.
Micronesia (country) has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Micronesia (country) | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 83 | 56.71 | 26.28 | Micronesia (country) |
| 2010s | 83 | 67.64 | 15.36 | Micronesia (country) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score, Micronesia (country) or Sri Lanka?
- Micronesia (country), at 83 against 82.71 in Sri Lanka as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score between Micronesia (country) and Sri Lanka?
- 0.29, with Micronesia (country) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Micronesia (country) and Sri Lanka?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Micronesia (country) and Sri Lanka rank globally for dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score?
- Micronesia (country) ranks 24th and Sri Lanka ranks 25th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for time benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.