Nepal vs Philippines: Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score

Nepal
73.49
in 2019
Philippines
72.91
in 2019
Nepal rank
69th
Philippines rank
71st

Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score over time

  • Nepal
  • Philippines
020406080200520122019

How they compare

Nepal currently reports 73.49 against 72.91 in Philippines, a difference of 0.58.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Philippines ahead.

Nepal ranks 69th and Philippines ranks 71st of 188 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Nepal averaged higher in 1 and Philippines in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Nepal Philippines Difference Ahead
2000s 64.84 70.37 5.53 Philippines
2010s 75.16 71.82 3.34 Nepal

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score, Nepal or Philippines?
Nepal, at 73.49 against 72.91 in Philippines as of 2019.
What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score between Nepal and Philippines?
0.58, with Nepal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Nepal and Philippines?
15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
How do Nepal and Philippines rank globally for dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score?
Nepal ranks 69th and Philippines ranks 71st of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,783 data points, 2005–2019
Last refreshed

The score for time benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.