Netherlands vs Portugal: Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score

Netherlands
61.1
in 2019
Portugal
61.38
in 2019
Netherlands rank
116th
Portugal rank
114th

Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score over time

  • Netherlands
  • Portugal
0204060200520122019

How they compare

Portugal currently reports 61.38 against 61.1 in Netherlands, a difference of 0.28.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Netherlands ahead.

Netherlands ranks 116th and Portugal ranks 114th of 188 countries.

Netherlands has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Netherlands Portugal Difference Ahead
2000s 55.76 8.7 47.06 Netherlands
2010s 60.03 58.27 1.76 Netherlands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score, Netherlands or Portugal?
Portugal, at 61.38 against 61.1 in Netherlands as of 2019.
What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score between Netherlands and Portugal?
0.28, with Portugal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Netherlands and Portugal?
15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
How do Netherlands and Portugal rank globally for dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score?
Netherlands ranks 116th and Portugal ranks 114th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,783 data points, 2005–2019
Last refreshed

The score for time benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.