Puerto Rico vs Russian Federation: Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score
Puerto Rico
59.94
in 2019
Russian Federation
60.09
in 2019
Puerto Rico rank
122nd
Russian Federation rank
121st
Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score over time
- Puerto Rico
- Russian Federation
How they compare
Russian Federation currently reports 60.09 against 59.94 in Puerto Rico, a difference of 0.15.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Puerto Rico ahead.
Puerto Rico ranks 122nd and Russian Federation ranks 121st of 190 countries.
Puerto Rico has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Puerto Rico | Russian Federation | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 57.06 | 0 | 57.06 | Puerto Rico |
| 2010s | 57.41 | 35.79 | 21.62 | Puerto Rico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score, Puerto Rico or Russian Federation?
- Russian Federation, at 60.09 against 59.94 in Puerto Rico as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score between Puerto Rico and Russian Federation?
- 0.15, with Russian Federation ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Puerto Rico and Russian Federation?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Puerto Rico and Russian Federation rank globally for dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score?
- Puerto Rico ranks 122nd and Russian Federation ranks 121st of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for time benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.