Trinidad and Tobago vs Uruguay: Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score
Trinidad and Tobago
34.29
in 2019
Uruguay
31.12
in 2019
Trinidad and Tobago rank
169th
Uruguay rank
172nd
Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score over time
- Trinidad and Tobago
- Uruguay
How they compare
Trinidad and Tobago currently reports 34.29 against 31.12 in Uruguay, a difference of 3.17.
That makes Trinidad and Tobago's figure about 1.1 times Uruguay's.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Trinidad and Tobago has been ahead every year.
Trinidad and Tobago ranks 169th and Uruguay ranks 172nd of 190 countries.
Trinidad and Tobago has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Trinidad and Tobago | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 34.29 | 31.12 | 3.17 | Trinidad and Tobago |
| 2010s | 34.29 | 31.12 | 3.17 | Trinidad and Tobago |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score, Trinidad and Tobago or Uruguay?
- Trinidad and Tobago, at 34.29 against 31.12 in Uruguay as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score between Trinidad and Tobago and Uruguay?
- 3.17, with Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Trinidad and Tobago and Uruguay?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Trinidad and Tobago and Uruguay rank globally for dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score?
- Trinidad and Tobago ranks 169th and Uruguay ranks 172nd of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for time benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.