Africa vs Comoros: Enforcing contracts, cost
Africa
47.7%
in 2012
Comoros
89.4%
in 2012
Africa rank
5th
Comoros rank
6th
Enforcing contracts, cost over time
- Africa
- Comoros
How they compare
Comoros currently reports 89.4% against 47.7% in Africa, a difference of 41.7%.
That makes Comoros's figure about 1.9 times Africa's.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Comoros has been ahead every year.
Africa ranks 5th and Comoros ranks 6th of 6 groups.
Comoros has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Africa | Comoros | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 47.1% | 89.4% | 42.3% | Comoros |
| 2010s | 47.8% | 89.4% | 41.6% | Comoros |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts, cost, Africa or Comoros?
- Comoros, at 89.4% against 47.7% in Africa as of 2012.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts, cost between Africa and Comoros?
- 41.7%, with Comoros ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Africa and Comoros?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2012.
- How do Africa and Comoros rank globally for enforcing contracts, cost?
- Africa ranks 5th and Comoros ranks 6th of 6 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank, Doing Business project (http://www.doingbusiness.org/), published as Enforcing contracts, cost (% of claim). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Cost is recorded as a percentage of the claim, assumed to be equivalent to 200% of income per capita. Only official costs required by law are recorded, including court and enforcement costs and average attorney fees where the use of attorneys is mandatory or common. For more information, visit http://www.doingbusiness.org/MethodologySurveys/.