Algeria vs Mauritania: Enforcing contracts, cost
Enforcing contracts, cost over time
- Algeria
- Mauritania
How they compare
Mauritania currently reports 23.2% against 21.9% in Algeria, a difference of 1.3%.
That makes Mauritania's figure about 1.1 times Algeria's.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Mauritania has been ahead every year.
Algeria ranks 43rd and Mauritania ranks 40th of 51 countries.
Mauritania has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Algeria | Mauritania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 21.9% | 23.2% | 1.3% | Mauritania |
| 2010s | 21.9% | 23.2% | 1.3% | Mauritania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts, cost, Algeria or Mauritania?
- Mauritania, at 23.2% against 21.9% in Algeria as of 2012.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts, cost between Algeria and Mauritania?
- 1.3%, with Mauritania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Algeria and Mauritania?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2012.
- How do Algeria and Mauritania rank globally for enforcing contracts, cost?
- Algeria ranks 43rd and Mauritania ranks 40th of 51 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank, Doing Business project (http://www.doingbusiness.org/), published as Enforcing contracts, cost (% of claim). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Cost is recorded as a percentage of the claim, assumed to be equivalent to 200% of income per capita. Only official costs required by law are recorded, including court and enforcement costs and average attorney fees where the use of attorneys is mandatory or common. For more information, visit http://www.doingbusiness.org/MethodologySurveys/.