Benin vs Rwanda: Enforcing contracts, cost
Benin
64.7%
in 2012
Rwanda
78.7%
in 2012
Benin rank
10th
Rwanda rank
9th
Enforcing contracts, cost over time
- Benin
- Rwanda
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 78.7% against 64.7% in Benin, a difference of 14.0%.
That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.2 times Benin's.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Rwanda has been ahead every year.
Benin ranks 10th and Rwanda ranks 9th of 51 countries.
Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Benin | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 64.7% | 80.5% | 15.8% | Rwanda |
| 2010s | 64.7% | 78.7% | 14.0% | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts, cost, Benin or Rwanda?
- Rwanda, at 78.7% against 64.7% in Benin as of 2012.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts, cost between Benin and Rwanda?
- 14.0%, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Benin and Rwanda?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2012.
- How do Benin and Rwanda rank globally for enforcing contracts, cost?
- Benin ranks 10th and Rwanda ranks 9th of 51 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank, Doing Business project (http://www.doingbusiness.org/), published as Enforcing contracts, cost (% of claim). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Cost is recorded as a percentage of the claim, assumed to be equivalent to 200% of income per capita. Only official costs required by law are recorded, including court and enforcement costs and average attorney fees where the use of attorneys is mandatory or common. For more information, visit http://www.doingbusiness.org/MethodologySurveys/.