Botswana vs South Africa: Enforcing contracts, cost
Enforcing contracts, cost over time
- Botswana
- South Africa
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 33.2% against 28.1% in Botswana, a difference of 5.1%.
That makes South Africa's figure about 1.2 times Botswana's.
Across all 10 years both countries report, South Africa has been ahead every year.
Botswana ranks 35th and South Africa ranks 32nd of 51 countries.
South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 28.1% | 33.2% | 5.1% | South Africa |
| 2010s | 28.1% | 33.2% | 5.1% | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts, cost, Botswana or South Africa?
- South Africa, at 33.2% against 28.1% in Botswana as of 2012.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts, cost between Botswana and South Africa?
- 5.1%, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and South Africa?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2012.
- How do Botswana and South Africa rank globally for enforcing contracts, cost?
- Botswana ranks 35th and South Africa ranks 32nd of 51 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank, Doing Business project (http://www.doingbusiness.org/), published as Enforcing contracts, cost (% of claim). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Cost is recorded as a percentage of the claim, assumed to be equivalent to 200% of income per capita. Only official costs required by law are recorded, including court and enforcement costs and average attorney fees where the use of attorneys is mandatory or common. For more information, visit http://www.doingbusiness.org/MethodologySurveys/.