Cape Verde vs Mauritius: Enforcing contracts, cost
Enforcing contracts, cost over time
- Cape Verde
- Mauritius
How they compare
Cape Verde currently reports 19.8% against 16.3% in Mauritius, a difference of 3.5%.
That makes Cape Verde's figure about 1.2 times Mauritius's.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Cape Verde has been ahead every year.
Cape Verde ranks 45th and Mauritius ranks 48th of 51 countries.
Cape Verde has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cape Verde | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 21.8% | 16.3% | 5.5% | Cape Verde |
| 2010s | 20.5% | 16.3% | 4.2% | Cape Verde |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts, cost, Cape Verde or Mauritius?
- Cape Verde, at 19.8% against 16.3% in Mauritius as of 2012.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts, cost between Cape Verde and Mauritius?
- 3.5%, with Cape Verde ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Mauritius?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2012.
- How do Cape Verde and Mauritius rank globally for enforcing contracts, cost?
- Cape Verde ranks 45th and Mauritius ranks 48th of 51 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank, Doing Business project (http://www.doingbusiness.org/), published as Enforcing contracts, cost (% of claim). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Cost is recorded as a percentage of the claim, assumed to be equivalent to 200% of income per capita. Only official costs required by law are recorded, including court and enforcement costs and average attorney fees where the use of attorneys is mandatory or common. For more information, visit http://www.doingbusiness.org/MethodologySurveys/.