Comoros vs North Africa: Enforcing contracts, cost
Enforcing contracts, cost over time
- Comoros
- North Africa
How they compare
Comoros currently reports 89.4% against 25.8% in North Africa, a difference of 63.6%.
That makes Comoros's figure about 3.5 times North Africa's.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Comoros has been ahead every year.
Comoros ranks 6th and North Africa ranks 6th of 51 countries.
Comoros has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Comoros | North Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 89.4% | 25.8% | 63.6% | Comoros |
| 2010s | 89.4% | 25.8% | 63.6% | Comoros |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts, cost, Comoros or North Africa?
- Comoros, at 89.4% against 25.8% in North Africa as of 2012.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts, cost between Comoros and North Africa?
- 63.6%, with Comoros ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Comoros and North Africa?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2012.
- How do Comoros and North Africa rank globally for enforcing contracts, cost?
- Comoros ranks 6th and North Africa ranks 6th of 51 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank, Doing Business project (http://www.doingbusiness.org/), published as Enforcing contracts, cost (% of claim). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Cost is recorded as a percentage of the claim, assumed to be equivalent to 200% of income per capita. Only official costs required by law are recorded, including court and enforcement costs and average attorney fees where the use of attorneys is mandatory or common. For more information, visit http://www.doingbusiness.org/MethodologySurveys/.