Egypt vs Morocco: Enforcing contracts, cost
Egypt
26.2%
in 2012
Morocco
25.2%
in 2012
Egypt rank
37th
Morocco rank
38th
Enforcing contracts, cost over time
- Egypt
- Morocco
How they compare
Egypt currently reports 26.2% against 25.2% in Morocco, a difference of 1.0%.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Egypt has been ahead every year.
Egypt ranks 37th and Morocco ranks 38th of 51 countries.
Egypt has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Egypt | Morocco | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 26.2% | 25.2% | 1.0% | Egypt |
| 2010s | 26.2% | 25.2% | 1.0% | Egypt |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts, cost, Egypt or Morocco?
- Egypt, at 26.2% against 25.2% in Morocco as of 2012.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts, cost between Egypt and Morocco?
- 1.0%, with Egypt ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Morocco?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2012.
- How do Egypt and Morocco rank globally for enforcing contracts, cost?
- Egypt ranks 37th and Morocco ranks 38th of 51 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank, Doing Business project (http://www.doingbusiness.org/), published as Enforcing contracts, cost (% of claim). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Cost is recorded as a percentage of the claim, assumed to be equivalent to 200% of income per capita. Only official costs required by law are recorded, including court and enforcement costs and average attorney fees where the use of attorneys is mandatory or common. For more information, visit http://www.doingbusiness.org/MethodologySurveys/.