Equatorial Guinea vs Tunisia: Enforcing contracts, cost
Enforcing contracts, cost over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Tunisia
How they compare
Tunisia currently reports 21.8% against 18.5% in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 3.3%.
That makes Tunisia's figure about 1.2 times Equatorial Guinea's.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Tunisia has been ahead every year.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 47th and Tunisia ranks 44th of 51 countries.
Tunisia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 18.5% | 21.8% | 3.3% | Tunisia |
| 2010s | 18.5% | 21.8% | 3.3% | Tunisia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts, cost, Equatorial Guinea or Tunisia?
- Tunisia, at 21.8% against 18.5% in Equatorial Guinea as of 2012.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts, cost between Equatorial Guinea and Tunisia?
- 3.3%, with Tunisia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Tunisia?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2012.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Tunisia rank globally for enforcing contracts, cost?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 47th and Tunisia ranks 44th of 51 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank, Doing Business project (http://www.doingbusiness.org/), published as Enforcing contracts, cost (% of claim). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Cost is recorded as a percentage of the claim, assumed to be equivalent to 200% of income per capita. Only official costs required by law are recorded, including court and enforcement costs and average attorney fees where the use of attorneys is mandatory or common. For more information, visit http://www.doingbusiness.org/MethodologySurveys/.