Eritrea vs Tunisia: Enforcing contracts, cost
Eritrea
22.6%
in 2012
Tunisia
21.8%
in 2012
Eritrea rank
42nd
Tunisia rank
44th
Enforcing contracts, cost over time
- Eritrea
- Tunisia
How they compare
Eritrea currently reports 22.6% against 21.8% in Tunisia, a difference of 0.8%.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Eritrea has been ahead every year.
Eritrea ranks 42nd and Tunisia ranks 44th of 51 countries.
Eritrea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 22.6% | 21.8% | 0.8% | Eritrea |
| 2010s | 22.6% | 21.8% | 0.8% | Eritrea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts, cost, Eritrea or Tunisia?
- Eritrea, at 22.6% against 21.8% in Tunisia as of 2012.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts, cost between Eritrea and Tunisia?
- 0.8%, with Eritrea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Tunisia?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2012.
- How do Eritrea and Tunisia rank globally for enforcing contracts, cost?
- Eritrea ranks 42nd and Tunisia ranks 44th of 51 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank, Doing Business project (http://www.doingbusiness.org/), published as Enforcing contracts, cost (% of claim). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Cost is recorded as a percentage of the claim, assumed to be equivalent to 200% of income per capita. Only official costs required by law are recorded, including court and enforcement costs and average attorney fees where the use of attorneys is mandatory or common. For more information, visit http://www.doingbusiness.org/MethodologySurveys/.