Eswatini vs Rwanda: Enforcing contracts, cost
Eswatini
56.1%
in 2012
Rwanda
78.7%
in 2012
Eswatini rank
12th
Rwanda rank
9th
Enforcing contracts, cost over time
- Eswatini
- Rwanda
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 78.7% against 56.1% in Eswatini, a difference of 22.6%.
That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.4 times Eswatini's.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Rwanda has been ahead every year.
Eswatini ranks 12th and Rwanda ranks 9th of 51 countries.
Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 56.1% | 78.7% | 22.6% | Rwanda |
| 2010s | 56.1% | 78.7% | 22.6% | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts, cost, Eswatini or Rwanda?
- Rwanda, at 78.7% against 56.1% in Eswatini as of 2012.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts, cost between Eswatini and Rwanda?
- 22.6%, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Rwanda?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2012.
- How do Eswatini and Rwanda rank globally for enforcing contracts, cost?
- Eswatini ranks 12th and Rwanda ranks 9th of 51 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank, Doing Business project (http://www.doingbusiness.org/), published as Enforcing contracts, cost (% of claim). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Cost is recorded as a percentage of the claim, assumed to be equivalent to 200% of income per capita. Only official costs required by law are recorded, including court and enforcement costs and average attorney fees where the use of attorneys is mandatory or common. For more information, visit http://www.doingbusiness.org/MethodologySurveys/.