Ethiopia vs Mauritius: Enforcing contracts, cost
Ethiopia
15.2%
in 2012
Mauritius
16.3%
in 2012
Ethiopia rank
50th
Mauritius rank
48th
Enforcing contracts, cost over time
- Ethiopia
- Mauritius
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 16.3% against 15.2% in Ethiopia, a difference of 1.1%.
That makes Mauritius's figure about 1.1 times Ethiopia's.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Mauritius has been ahead every year.
Ethiopia ranks 50th and Mauritius ranks 48th of 51 countries.
Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 15.2% | 16.3% | 1.1% | Mauritius |
| 2010s | 15.2% | 16.3% | 1.1% | Mauritius |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts, cost, Ethiopia or Mauritius?
- Mauritius, at 16.3% against 15.2% in Ethiopia as of 2012.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts, cost between Ethiopia and Mauritius?
- 1.1%, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia and Mauritius?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2012.
- How do Ethiopia and Mauritius rank globally for enforcing contracts, cost?
- Ethiopia ranks 50th and Mauritius ranks 48th of 51 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank, Doing Business project (http://www.doingbusiness.org/), published as Enforcing contracts, cost (% of claim). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Cost is recorded as a percentage of the claim, assumed to be equivalent to 200% of income per capita. Only official costs required by law are recorded, including court and enforcement costs and average attorney fees where the use of attorneys is mandatory or common. For more information, visit http://www.doingbusiness.org/MethodologySurveys/.