Guinea-Bissau vs Mauritania: Enforcing contracts, cost
Enforcing contracts, cost over time
- Guinea-Bissau
- Mauritania
How they compare
Guinea-Bissau currently reports 25.0% against 23.2% in Mauritania, a difference of 1.8%.
That makes Guinea-Bissau's figure about 1.1 times Mauritania's.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Guinea-Bissau has been ahead every year.
Guinea-Bissau ranks 39th and Mauritania ranks 40th of 51 countries.
Guinea-Bissau has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guinea-Bissau | Mauritania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 25.0% | 23.2% | 1.8% | Guinea-Bissau |
| 2010s | 25.0% | 23.2% | 1.8% | Guinea-Bissau |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts, cost, Guinea-Bissau or Mauritania?
- Guinea-Bissau, at 25.0% against 23.2% in Mauritania as of 2012.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts, cost between Guinea-Bissau and Mauritania?
- 1.8%, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Mauritania?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2012.
- How do Guinea-Bissau and Mauritania rank globally for enforcing contracts, cost?
- Guinea-Bissau ranks 39th and Mauritania ranks 40th of 51 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank, Doing Business project (http://www.doingbusiness.org/), published as Enforcing contracts, cost (% of claim). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Cost is recorded as a percentage of the claim, assumed to be equivalent to 200% of income per capita. Only official costs required by law are recorded, including court and enforcement costs and average attorney fees where the use of attorneys is mandatory or common. For more information, visit http://www.doingbusiness.org/MethodologySurveys/.