Madagascar vs Zambia: Enforcing contracts, cost
Madagascar
42.4%
in 2012
Zambia
38.7%
in 2012
Madagascar rank
23rd
Zambia rank
25th
Enforcing contracts, cost over time
- Madagascar
- Zambia
How they compare
Madagascar currently reports 42.4% against 38.7% in Zambia, a difference of 3.7%.
That makes Madagascar's figure about 1.1 times Zambia's.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Madagascar has been ahead every year.
Madagascar ranks 23rd and Zambia ranks 25th of 51 countries.
Madagascar has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Madagascar | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 42.4% | 38.7% | 3.7% | Madagascar |
| 2010s | 42.4% | 38.7% | 3.7% | Madagascar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts, cost, Madagascar or Zambia?
- Madagascar, at 42.4% against 38.7% in Zambia as of 2012.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts, cost between Madagascar and Zambia?
- 3.7%, with Madagascar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Madagascar and Zambia?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2012.
- How do Madagascar and Zambia rank globally for enforcing contracts, cost?
- Madagascar ranks 23rd and Zambia ranks 25th of 51 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank, Doing Business project (http://www.doingbusiness.org/), published as Enforcing contracts, cost (% of claim). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Cost is recorded as a percentage of the claim, assumed to be equivalent to 200% of income per capita. Only official costs required by law are recorded, including court and enforcement costs and average attorney fees where the use of attorneys is mandatory or common. For more information, visit http://www.doingbusiness.org/MethodologySurveys/.