Mauritius vs Tanzania: Enforcing contracts, cost
Mauritius
16.3%
in 2012
Tanzania
14.3%
in 2012
Mauritius rank
48th
Tanzania rank
51st
Enforcing contracts, cost over time
- Mauritius
- Tanzania
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 16.3% against 14.3% in Tanzania, a difference of 2.0%.
That makes Mauritius's figure about 1.1 times Tanzania's.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Mauritius has been ahead every year.
Mauritius ranks 48th and Tanzania ranks 51st of 51 countries.
Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | Tanzania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 16.3% | 14.3% | 2.0% | Mauritius |
| 2010s | 16.3% | 14.3% | 2.0% | Mauritius |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts, cost, Mauritius or Tanzania?
- Mauritius, at 16.3% against 14.3% in Tanzania as of 2012.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts, cost between Mauritius and Tanzania?
- 2.0%, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Tanzania?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2012.
- How do Mauritius and Tanzania rank globally for enforcing contracts, cost?
- Mauritius ranks 48th and Tanzania ranks 51st of 51 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank, Doing Business project (http://www.doingbusiness.org/), published as Enforcing contracts, cost (% of claim). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Cost is recorded as a percentage of the claim, assumed to be equivalent to 200% of income per capita. Only official costs required by law are recorded, including court and enforcement costs and average attorney fees where the use of attorneys is mandatory or common. For more information, visit http://www.doingbusiness.org/MethodologySurveys/.