Mozambique vs North Africa: Enforcing contracts, cost
Enforcing contracts, cost over time
- Mozambique
- North Africa
How they compare
Mozambique currently reports 142.5% against 25.8% in North Africa, a difference of 116.7%.
That makes Mozambique's figure about 5.5 times North Africa's.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Mozambique has been ahead every year.
Mozambique ranks 3rd and North Africa ranks 6th of 51 countries.
Mozambique has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mozambique | North Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 142.5% | 25.2% | 117.3% | Mozambique |
| 2010s | 142.5% | 25.8% | 116.7% | Mozambique |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts, cost, Mozambique or North Africa?
- Mozambique, at 142.5% against 25.8% in North Africa as of 2012.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts, cost between Mozambique and North Africa?
- 116.7%, with Mozambique ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mozambique and North Africa?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2012.
- How do Mozambique and North Africa rank globally for enforcing contracts, cost?
- Mozambique ranks 3rd and North Africa ranks 6th of 51 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank, Doing Business project (http://www.doingbusiness.org/), published as Enforcing contracts, cost (% of claim). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Cost is recorded as a percentage of the claim, assumed to be equivalent to 200% of income per capita. Only official costs required by law are recorded, including court and enforcement costs and average attorney fees where the use of attorneys is mandatory or common. For more information, visit http://www.doingbusiness.org/MethodologySurveys/.