Namibia vs Zambia: Enforcing contracts, cost
Namibia
35.8%
in 2012
Zambia
38.7%
in 2012
Namibia rank
28th
Zambia rank
25th
Enforcing contracts, cost over time
- Namibia
- Zambia
How they compare
Zambia currently reports 38.7% against 35.8% in Namibia, a difference of 2.9%.
That makes Zambia's figure about 1.1 times Namibia's.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Zambia has been ahead every year.
Namibia ranks 28th and Zambia ranks 25th of 51 countries.
Zambia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Namibia | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 35.8% | 38.7% | 2.9% | Zambia |
| 2010s | 35.8% | 38.7% | 2.9% | Zambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts, cost, Namibia or Zambia?
- Zambia, at 38.7% against 35.8% in Namibia as of 2012.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts, cost between Namibia and Zambia?
- 2.9%, with Zambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Zambia?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2012.
- How do Namibia and Zambia rank globally for enforcing contracts, cost?
- Namibia ranks 28th and Zambia ranks 25th of 51 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank, Doing Business project (http://www.doingbusiness.org/), published as Enforcing contracts, cost (% of claim). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Cost is recorded as a percentage of the claim, assumed to be equivalent to 200% of income per capita. Only official costs required by law are recorded, including court and enforcement costs and average attorney fees where the use of attorneys is mandatory or common. For more information, visit http://www.doingbusiness.org/MethodologySurveys/.