North Africa vs Zimbabwe: Enforcing contracts, cost
Enforcing contracts, cost over time
- North Africa
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 113.1% against 25.8% in North Africa, a difference of 87.3%.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 4.4 times North Africa's.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.
North Africa ranks 6th and Zimbabwe ranks 4th of 6 groups.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | North Africa | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 25.2% | 32.0% | 6.8% | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 25.8% | 113.1% | 87.3% | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts, cost, North Africa or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 113.1% against 25.8% in North Africa as of 2012.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts, cost between North Africa and Zimbabwe?
- 87.3%, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for North Africa and Zimbabwe?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2012.
- How do North Africa and Zimbabwe rank globally for enforcing contracts, cost?
- North Africa ranks 6th and Zimbabwe ranks 4th of 6 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank, Doing Business project (http://www.doingbusiness.org/), published as Enforcing contracts, cost (% of claim). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Cost is recorded as a percentage of the claim, assumed to be equivalent to 200% of income per capita. Only official costs required by law are recorded, including court and enforcement costs and average attorney fees where the use of attorneys is mandatory or common. For more information, visit http://www.doingbusiness.org/MethodologySurveys/.