Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) vs Zimbabwe: Enforcing contracts, cost

Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)
50.8%
in 2012
Zimbabwe
113.1%
in 2012
Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) rank
2nd
Zimbabwe rank
4th

Enforcing contracts, cost over time

  • Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)
  • Zimbabwe
406080100120200320072012

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 113.1% against 50.8% in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income), a difference of 62.3%.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 2.2 times Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)'s.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ahead.

Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ranks 2nd and Zimbabwe ranks 4th of 6 groups.

Across the 2 decades both report, Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
2000s 51.3% 32.0% 19.3% Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)
2010s 50.9% 113.1% 62.2% Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts, cost, Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 113.1% against 50.8% in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) as of 2012.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts, cost between Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) and Zimbabwe?
62.3%, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) and Zimbabwe?
10 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2012.
How do Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) and Zimbabwe rank globally for enforcing contracts, cost?
Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ranks 2nd and Zimbabwe ranks 4th of 6 groups.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank, Doing Business project (http://www.doingbusiness.org/), published as Enforcing contracts, cost (% of claim). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) vs Zimbabwe: Enforcing contracts, cost. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank, Doing Business project (http://www.doingbusiness.org/). Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://private-sector.statizoid.com/compare/enforcing-contracts-cost-percent-of-claim/sub-saharan-africa-excluding-high-income/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://private-sector.statizoid.com/compare/enforcing-contracts-cost-percent-of-claim/sub-saharan-africa-excluding-high-income/zimbabwe/">Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) vs Zimbabwe: Enforcing contracts, cost</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts, cost (% of claim)
Unit
% of claim
Source
World Bank, Doing Business project (http://www.doingbusiness.org/)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
57 places, 545 data points, 2003–2012
Last refreshed

Cost is recorded as a percentage of the claim, assumed to be equivalent to 200% of income per capita. Only official costs required by law are recorded, including court and enforcement costs and average attorney fees where the use of attorneys is mandatory or common. For more information, visit http://www.doingbusiness.org/MethodologySurveys/.