Bahamas vs Malaysia: Export unit value index (2015 = 100)
Export unit value index (2015 = 100) over time
- Bahamas
- Malaysia
How they compare
Bahamas currently reports 129.4 2015 = 100 against 129.4 2015 = 100 in Malaysia, a difference of 0 2015 = 100.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Malaysia ahead.
Bahamas ranks 121st and Malaysia ranks 121st of 208 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Bahamas averaged higher in 1 and Malaysia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bahamas | Malaysia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 69.09 2015 = 100 | 80.58 2015 = 100 | 11.49 2015 = 100 | Malaysia |
| 2010s | 105.36 2015 = 100 | 112.38 2015 = 100 | 7.02 2015 = 100 | Malaysia |
| 2020s | 129.67 2015 = 100 | 115.08 2015 = 100 | 14.58 2015 = 100 | Bahamas |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher export unit value index, Bahamas or Malaysia?
- Bahamas, at 129.4 2015 = 100 against 129.4 2015 = 100 in Malaysia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in export unit value index between Bahamas and Malaysia?
- 0 2015 = 100, with Bahamas ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and Malaysia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Bahamas and Malaysia rank globally for export unit value index?
- Bahamas ranks 121st and Malaysia ranks 121st of 208 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Handbook of Statistics and data files., UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), published as Export unit value index (2015 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Export unit value indices come from UNCTAD's trade database. Unit value indices are based on data reported by countries that demonstrate consistency under UNCTAD quality controls, supplemented by UNCTAD’s estimates using the previous year’s trade values at the Standard International Trade Classification three-digit level as weights. To improve data coverage, especially for the latest periods, UNCTAD constructs a set of average prices indexes at the three-digit product classification of the Standard International Trade Classification revision 3 using UNCTAD’s Commodity Price Statistics, interna¬tional and national sources, and UNCTAD secretariat estimates. This indicator is an index series where 2015=100.