Bhutan vs Sao Tome and Principe: Export unit value index
Export unit value index over time
- Bhutan
- Sao Tome and Principe
How they compare
Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 165.2 2015 = 100 against 163.3 2015 = 100 in Bhutan, a difference of 1.9 2015 = 100.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
Bhutan ranks 26th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 23rd of 207 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Bhutan averaged higher in 2 and Sao Tome and Principe in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bhutan | Sao Tome and Principe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 110.35 2015 = 100 | 103.81 2015 = 100 | 6.54 2015 = 100 | Bhutan |
| 2010s | 109.9 2015 = 100 | 122.69 2015 = 100 | 12.79 2015 = 100 | Sao Tome and Principe |
| 2020s | 172.62 2015 = 100 | 134.52 2015 = 100 | 38.1 2015 = 100 | Bhutan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher export unit value index, Bhutan or Sao Tome and Principe?
- Sao Tome and Principe, at 165.2 2015 = 100 against 163.3 2015 = 100 in Bhutan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in export unit value index between Bhutan and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 1.9 2015 = 100, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Bhutan and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for export unit value index?
- Bhutan ranks 26th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 23rd of 207 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Handbook of Statistics and data files., UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), published as Export unit value index (2015 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Export unit value indices come from UNCTAD's trade database. Unit value indices are based on data reported by countries that demonstrate consistency under UNCTAD quality controls, supplemented by UNCTAD’s estimates using the previous year’s trade values at the Standard International Trade Classification three-digit level as weights. To improve data coverage, especially for the latest periods, UNCTAD constructs a set of average prices indexes at the three-digit product classification of the Standard International Trade Classification revision 3 using UNCTAD’s Commodity Price Statistics, interna¬tional and national sources, and UNCTAD secretariat estimates. This indicator is an index series where 2015=100.