Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Vanuatu: Export unit value index
Export unit value index over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Vanuatu
How they compare
Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 135 2015 = 100 against 134.6 2015 = 100 in Vanuatu, a difference of 0.4 2015 = 100.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Vanuatu ahead.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 100th and Vanuatu ranks 103rd of 207 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Bosnia and Herzegovina averaged higher in 2 and Vanuatu in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Vanuatu | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 81.38 2015 = 100 | 83.09 2015 = 100 | 1.71 2015 = 100 | Vanuatu |
| 2010s | 107.42 2015 = 100 | 101.72 2015 = 100 | 5.7 2015 = 100 | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2020s | 130.28 2015 = 100 | 115.88 2015 = 100 | 14.4 2015 = 100 | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher export unit value index, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Vanuatu?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 135 2015 = 100 against 134.6 2015 = 100 in Vanuatu as of 2024.
- What is the difference in export unit value index between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Vanuatu?
- 0.4 2015 = 100, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Vanuatu?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Vanuatu rank globally for export unit value index?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 100th and Vanuatu ranks 103rd of 207 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Handbook of Statistics and data files., UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), published as Export unit value index (2015 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Export unit value indices come from UNCTAD's trade database. Unit value indices are based on data reported by countries that demonstrate consistency under UNCTAD quality controls, supplemented by UNCTAD’s estimates using the previous year’s trade values at the Standard International Trade Classification three-digit level as weights. To improve data coverage, especially for the latest periods, UNCTAD constructs a set of average prices indexes at the three-digit product classification of the Standard International Trade Classification revision 3 using UNCTAD’s Commodity Price Statistics, interna¬tional and national sources, and UNCTAD secretariat estimates. This indicator is an index series where 2015=100.