British Virgin Islands vs Jordan: Export unit value index
Export unit value index over time
- British Virgin Islands
- Jordan
How they compare
Jordan currently reports 94.5 2015 = 100 against 84.3 2015 = 100 in British Virgin Islands, a difference of 10.2 2015 = 100.
That makes Jordan's figure about 1.1 times British Virgin Islands's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was British Virgin Islands ahead.
British Virgin Islands ranks 205th and Jordan ranks 202nd of 207 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, British Virgin Islands averaged higher in 1 and Jordan in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | British Virgin Islands | Jordan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 75.87 2015 = 100 | 65.29 2015 = 100 | 10.58 2015 = 100 | British Virgin Islands |
| 2010s | 94.55 2015 = 100 | 99.36 2015 = 100 | 4.81 2015 = 100 | Jordan |
| 2020s | 87.66 2015 = 100 | 96.66 2015 = 100 | 9 2015 = 100 | Jordan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher export unit value index, British Virgin Islands or Jordan?
- Jordan, at 94.5 2015 = 100 against 84.3 2015 = 100 in British Virgin Islands as of 2024.
- What is the difference in export unit value index between British Virgin Islands and Jordan?
- 10.2 2015 = 100, with Jordan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for British Virgin Islands and Jordan?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do British Virgin Islands and Jordan rank globally for export unit value index?
- British Virgin Islands ranks 205th and Jordan ranks 202nd of 207 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Handbook of Statistics and data files., UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), published as Export unit value index (2015 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Export unit value indices come from UNCTAD's trade database. Unit value indices are based on data reported by countries that demonstrate consistency under UNCTAD quality controls, supplemented by UNCTAD’s estimates using the previous year’s trade values at the Standard International Trade Classification three-digit level as weights. To improve data coverage, especially for the latest periods, UNCTAD constructs a set of average prices indexes at the three-digit product classification of the Standard International Trade Classification revision 3 using UNCTAD’s Commodity Price Statistics, interna¬tional and national sources, and UNCTAD secretariat estimates. This indicator is an index series where 2015=100.