British Virgin Islands vs Sri Lanka: Export unit value index
Export unit value index over time
- British Virgin Islands
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
British Virgin Islands currently reports 84.3 2015 = 100 against 83.5 2015 = 100 in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0.8 2015 = 100.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Sri Lanka ahead.
British Virgin Islands ranks 205th and Sri Lanka ranks 206th of 207 countries.
Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | British Virgin Islands | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 75.87 2015 = 100 | 83.88 2015 = 100 | 8.01 2015 = 100 | Sri Lanka |
| 2010s | 94.55 2015 = 100 | 105.1 2015 = 100 | 10.55 2015 = 100 | Sri Lanka |
| 2020s | 87.66 2015 = 100 | 91.18 2015 = 100 | 3.52 2015 = 100 | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher export unit value index, British Virgin Islands or Sri Lanka?
- British Virgin Islands, at 84.3 2015 = 100 against 83.5 2015 = 100 in Sri Lanka as of 2024.
- What is the difference in export unit value index between British Virgin Islands and Sri Lanka?
- 0.8 2015 = 100, with British Virgin Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for British Virgin Islands and Sri Lanka?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do British Virgin Islands and Sri Lanka rank globally for export unit value index?
- British Virgin Islands ranks 205th and Sri Lanka ranks 206th of 207 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Handbook of Statistics and data files., UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), published as Export unit value index (2015 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Export unit value indices come from UNCTAD's trade database. Unit value indices are based on data reported by countries that demonstrate consistency under UNCTAD quality controls, supplemented by UNCTAD’s estimates using the previous year’s trade values at the Standard International Trade Classification three-digit level as weights. To improve data coverage, especially for the latest periods, UNCTAD constructs a set of average prices indexes at the three-digit product classification of the Standard International Trade Classification revision 3 using UNCTAD’s Commodity Price Statistics, interna¬tional and national sources, and UNCTAD secretariat estimates. This indicator is an index series where 2015=100.