Bulgaria vs Zimbabwe: Export unit value index
Export unit value index over time
- Bulgaria
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 149.4 2015 = 100 against 149.2 2015 = 100 in Bulgaria, a difference of 0.2 2015 = 100.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Bulgaria ranks 56th and Zimbabwe ranks 55th of 207 countries.
Bulgaria has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bulgaria | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 76.09 2015 = 100 | 71.99 2015 = 100 | 4.1 2015 = 100 | Bulgaria |
| 2010s | 112.63 2015 = 100 | 106.25 2015 = 100 | 6.38 2015 = 100 | Bulgaria |
| 2020s | 141.16 2015 = 100 | 131.22 2015 = 100 | 9.94 2015 = 100 | Bulgaria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher export unit value index, Bulgaria or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 149.4 2015 = 100 against 149.2 2015 = 100 in Bulgaria as of 2024.
- What is the difference in export unit value index between Bulgaria and Zimbabwe?
- 0.2 2015 = 100, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bulgaria and Zimbabwe?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Bulgaria and Zimbabwe rank globally for export unit value index?
- Bulgaria ranks 56th and Zimbabwe ranks 55th of 207 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Handbook of Statistics and data files., UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), published as Export unit value index (2015 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Export unit value indices come from UNCTAD's trade database. Unit value indices are based on data reported by countries that demonstrate consistency under UNCTAD quality controls, supplemented by UNCTAD’s estimates using the previous year’s trade values at the Standard International Trade Classification three-digit level as weights. To improve data coverage, especially for the latest periods, UNCTAD constructs a set of average prices indexes at the three-digit product classification of the Standard International Trade Classification revision 3 using UNCTAD’s Commodity Price Statistics, interna¬tional and national sources, and UNCTAD secretariat estimates. This indicator is an index series where 2015=100.