Burundi vs Uganda: Export unit value index (2015 = 100)
Export unit value index (2015 = 100) over time
- Burundi
- Uganda
How they compare
Burundi currently reports 211 2015 = 100 against 199.7 2015 = 100 in Uganda, a difference of 11.3 2015 = 100.
That makes Burundi's figure about 1.1 times Uganda's.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 44 shared years of data; in 1982 it was Burundi ahead.
Burundi ranks 7th and Uganda ranks 10th of 208 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Burundi averaged higher in 4 and Uganda in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burundi | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 312.44 2015 = 100 | 144.05 2015 = 100 | 168.39 2015 = 100 | Burundi |
| 1990s | 162.42 2015 = 100 | 86.01 2015 = 100 | 76.41 2015 = 100 | Burundi |
| 2000s | 63.97 2015 = 100 | 69.36 2015 = 100 | 5.39 2015 = 100 | Uganda |
| 2010s | 112.46 2015 = 100 | 104.47 2015 = 100 | 7.99 2015 = 100 | Burundi |
| 2020s | 149.48 2015 = 100 | 145.25 2015 = 100 | 4.23 2015 = 100 | Burundi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher export unit value index, Burundi or Uganda?
- Burundi, at 211 2015 = 100 against 199.7 2015 = 100 in Uganda as of 2025.
- What is the difference in export unit value index between Burundi and Uganda?
- 11.3 2015 = 100, with Burundi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Uganda?
- 44 years are reported by both, from 1982 to 2025.
- How do Burundi and Uganda rank globally for export unit value index?
- Burundi ranks 7th and Uganda ranks 10th of 208 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Handbook of Statistics and data files., UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), published as Export unit value index (2015 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Export unit value indices come from UNCTAD's trade database. Unit value indices are based on data reported by countries that demonstrate consistency under UNCTAD quality controls, supplemented by UNCTAD’s estimates using the previous year’s trade values at the Standard International Trade Classification three-digit level as weights. To improve data coverage, especially for the latest periods, UNCTAD constructs a set of average prices indexes at the three-digit product classification of the Standard International Trade Classification revision 3 using UNCTAD’s Commodity Price Statistics, interna¬tional and national sources, and UNCTAD secretariat estimates. This indicator is an index series where 2015=100.