Cape Verde vs Singapore: Export unit value index
Export unit value index over time
- Cape Verde
- Singapore
How they compare
Cape Verde currently reports 113.2 2015 = 100 against 112.1 2015 = 100 in Singapore, a difference of 1.1 2015 = 100.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 45 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Singapore ahead.
Cape Verde ranks 176th and Singapore ranks 177th of 207 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Cape Verde averaged higher in 1 and Singapore in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cape Verde | Singapore | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 49.19 2015 = 100 | 126.08 2015 = 100 | 76.89 2015 = 100 | Singapore |
| 1990s | 66.15 2015 = 100 | 124.83 2015 = 100 | 58.68 2015 = 100 | Singapore |
| 2000s | 69.89 2015 = 100 | 102.85 2015 = 100 | 32.96 2015 = 100 | Singapore |
| 2010s | 104.24 2015 = 100 | 111.51 2015 = 100 | 7.27 2015 = 100 | Singapore |
| 2020s | 112.42 2015 = 100 | 110.28 2015 = 100 | 2.14 2015 = 100 | Cape Verde |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher export unit value index, Cape Verde or Singapore?
- Cape Verde, at 113.2 2015 = 100 against 112.1 2015 = 100 in Singapore as of 2024.
- What is the difference in export unit value index between Cape Verde and Singapore?
- 1.1 2015 = 100, with Cape Verde ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Singapore?
- 45 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2024.
- How do Cape Verde and Singapore rank globally for export unit value index?
- Cape Verde ranks 176th and Singapore ranks 177th of 207 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Handbook of Statistics and data files., UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), published as Export unit value index (2015 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Export unit value indices come from UNCTAD's trade database. Unit value indices are based on data reported by countries that demonstrate consistency under UNCTAD quality controls, supplemented by UNCTAD’s estimates using the previous year’s trade values at the Standard International Trade Classification three-digit level as weights. To improve data coverage, especially for the latest periods, UNCTAD constructs a set of average prices indexes at the three-digit product classification of the Standard International Trade Classification revision 3 using UNCTAD’s Commodity Price Statistics, interna¬tional and national sources, and UNCTAD secretariat estimates. This indicator is an index series where 2015=100.