Cambodia vs Philippines: Export unit value index
Export unit value index over time
- Cambodia
- Philippines
How they compare
Cambodia currently reports 116.1 2015 = 100 against 114.3 2015 = 100 in Philippines, a difference of 1.8 2015 = 100.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Philippines ahead.
Cambodia ranks 170th and Philippines ranks 172nd of 207 countries.
Philippines has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cambodia | Philippines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 85.32 2015 = 100 | 93.33 2015 = 100 | 8.01 2015 = 100 | Philippines |
| 2010s | 99.97 2015 = 100 | 101.95 2015 = 100 | 1.98 2015 = 100 | Philippines |
| 2020s | 109.44 2015 = 100 | 111.02 2015 = 100 | 1.58 2015 = 100 | Philippines |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher export unit value index, Cambodia or Philippines?
- Cambodia, at 116.1 2015 = 100 against 114.3 2015 = 100 in Philippines as of 2024.
- What is the difference in export unit value index between Cambodia and Philippines?
- 1.8 2015 = 100, with Cambodia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Philippines?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Cambodia and Philippines rank globally for export unit value index?
- Cambodia ranks 170th and Philippines ranks 172nd of 207 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Handbook of Statistics and data files., UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), published as Export unit value index (2015 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Export unit value indices come from UNCTAD's trade database. Unit value indices are based on data reported by countries that demonstrate consistency under UNCTAD quality controls, supplemented by UNCTAD’s estimates using the previous year’s trade values at the Standard International Trade Classification three-digit level as weights. To improve data coverage, especially for the latest periods, UNCTAD constructs a set of average prices indexes at the three-digit product classification of the Standard International Trade Classification revision 3 using UNCTAD’s Commodity Price Statistics, interna¬tional and national sources, and UNCTAD secretariat estimates. This indicator is an index series where 2015=100.