Central African Republic vs Russia: Export unit value index
Export unit value index over time
- Central African Republic
- Russia
How they compare
Russia currently reports 126.7 2015 = 100 against 125 2015 = 100 in Central African Republic, a difference of 1.7 2015 = 100.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Central African Republic ahead.
Central African Republic ranks 134th and Russia ranks 132nd of 207 groups.
Across the 3 decades both report, Central African Republic averaged higher in 1 and Russia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central African Republic | Russia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 93.25 2015 = 100 | 85.6 2015 = 100 | 7.65 2015 = 100 | Central African Republic |
| 2010s | 109.46 2015 = 100 | 129.02 2015 = 100 | 19.56 2015 = 100 | Russia |
| 2020s | 110.32 2015 = 100 | 126.52 2015 = 100 | 16.2 2015 = 100 | Russia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher export unit value index, Central African Republic or Russia?
- Russia, at 126.7 2015 = 100 against 125 2015 = 100 in Central African Republic as of 2024.
- What is the difference in export unit value index between Central African Republic and Russia?
- 1.7 2015 = 100, with Russia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Russia?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Central African Republic and Russia rank globally for export unit value index?
- Central African Republic ranks 134th and Russia ranks 132nd of 207 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Handbook of Statistics and data files., UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), published as Export unit value index (2015 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Export unit value indices come from UNCTAD's trade database. Unit value indices are based on data reported by countries that demonstrate consistency under UNCTAD quality controls, supplemented by UNCTAD’s estimates using the previous year’s trade values at the Standard International Trade Classification three-digit level as weights. To improve data coverage, especially for the latest periods, UNCTAD constructs a set of average prices indexes at the three-digit product classification of the Standard International Trade Classification revision 3 using UNCTAD’s Commodity Price Statistics, interna¬tional and national sources, and UNCTAD secretariat estimates. This indicator is an index series where 2015=100.