China vs French Polynesia: Export unit value index
Export unit value index over time
- China
- French Polynesia
How they compare
French Polynesia currently reports 99.5 2015 = 100 against 99 2015 = 100 in China, a difference of 0.5 2015 = 100.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was French Polynesia ahead.
China ranks 197th and French Polynesia ranks 196th of 207 countries.
China has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | French Polynesia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 79.91 2015 = 100 | 73.7 2015 = 100 | 6.21 2015 = 100 | China |
| 2010s | 97.35 2015 = 100 | 92.25 2015 = 100 | 5.1 2015 = 100 | China |
| 2020s | 104.1 2015 = 100 | 102.8 2015 = 100 | 1.3 2015 = 100 | China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher export unit value index, China or French Polynesia?
- French Polynesia, at 99.5 2015 = 100 against 99 2015 = 100 in China as of 2024.
- What is the difference in export unit value index between China and French Polynesia?
- 0.5 2015 = 100, with French Polynesia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and French Polynesia?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do China and French Polynesia rank globally for export unit value index?
- China ranks 197th and French Polynesia ranks 196th of 207 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Handbook of Statistics and data files., UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), published as Export unit value index (2015 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Export unit value indices come from UNCTAD's trade database. Unit value indices are based on data reported by countries that demonstrate consistency under UNCTAD quality controls, supplemented by UNCTAD’s estimates using the previous year’s trade values at the Standard International Trade Classification three-digit level as weights. To improve data coverage, especially for the latest periods, UNCTAD constructs a set of average prices indexes at the three-digit product classification of the Standard International Trade Classification revision 3 using UNCTAD’s Commodity Price Statistics, interna¬tional and national sources, and UNCTAD secretariat estimates. This indicator is an index series where 2015=100.