China vs Jordan: Export unit value index (2015 = 100)
Export unit value index (2015 = 100) over time
- China
- Jordan
How they compare
China currently reports 95.7 2015 = 100 against 95 2015 = 100 in Jordan, a difference of 0.7 2015 = 100.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 46 shared years of data; in 1980 it was China ahead.
China ranks 200th and Jordan ranks 202nd of 208 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, China averaged higher in 4 and Jordan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Jordan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 67.01 2015 = 100 | 39.8 2015 = 100 | 27.21 2015 = 100 | China |
| 1990s | 75.38 2015 = 100 | 45.37 2015 = 100 | 30.01 2015 = 100 | China |
| 2000s | 79.91 2015 = 100 | 65.29 2015 = 100 | 14.62 2015 = 100 | China |
| 2010s | 97.35 2015 = 100 | 99.36 2015 = 100 | 2.01 2015 = 100 | Jordan |
| 2020s | 102.73 2015 = 100 | 94.35 2015 = 100 | 8.38 2015 = 100 | China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher export unit value index, China or Jordan?
- China, at 95.7 2015 = 100 against 95 2015 = 100 in Jordan as of 2025.
- What is the difference in export unit value index between China and Jordan?
- 0.7 2015 = 100, with China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Jordan?
- 46 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2025.
- How do China and Jordan rank globally for export unit value index?
- China ranks 200th and Jordan ranks 202nd of 208 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Handbook of Statistics and data files., UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), published as Export unit value index (2015 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Export unit value indices come from UNCTAD's trade database. Unit value indices are based on data reported by countries that demonstrate consistency under UNCTAD quality controls, supplemented by UNCTAD’s estimates using the previous year’s trade values at the Standard International Trade Classification three-digit level as weights. To improve data coverage, especially for the latest periods, UNCTAD constructs a set of average prices indexes at the three-digit product classification of the Standard International Trade Classification revision 3 using UNCTAD’s Commodity Price Statistics, interna¬tional and national sources, and UNCTAD secretariat estimates. This indicator is an index series where 2015=100.