Congo vs Equatorial Guinea: Export unit value index
Export unit value index over time
- Congo
- Equatorial Guinea
How they compare
Equatorial Guinea currently reports 138.9 2015 = 100 against 138.5 2015 = 100 in Congo, a difference of 0.4 2015 = 100.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 40 shared years of data; in 1985 it was Congo ahead.
Congo ranks 88th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 86th of 207 countries.
Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Equatorial Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 28.42 2015 = 100 | 39.3 2015 = 100 | 10.88 2015 = 100 | Equatorial Guinea |
| 1990s | 31.18 2015 = 100 | 39.47 2015 = 100 | 8.29 2015 = 100 | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2000s | 79.37 2015 = 100 | 96.05 2015 = 100 | 16.68 2015 = 100 | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2010s | 123.83 2015 = 100 | 132.43 2015 = 100 | 8.6 2015 = 100 | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2020s | 130.28 2015 = 100 | 150.58 2015 = 100 | 20.3 2015 = 100 | Equatorial Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher export unit value index, Congo or Equatorial Guinea?
- Equatorial Guinea, at 138.9 2015 = 100 against 138.5 2015 = 100 in Congo as of 2024.
- What is the difference in export unit value index between Congo and Equatorial Guinea?
- 0.4 2015 = 100, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Equatorial Guinea?
- 40 years are reported by both, from 1985 to 2024.
- How do Congo and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for export unit value index?
- Congo ranks 88th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 86th of 207 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Handbook of Statistics and data files., UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), published as Export unit value index (2015 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Export unit value indices come from UNCTAD's trade database. Unit value indices are based on data reported by countries that demonstrate consistency under UNCTAD quality controls, supplemented by UNCTAD’s estimates using the previous year’s trade values at the Standard International Trade Classification three-digit level as weights. To improve data coverage, especially for the latest periods, UNCTAD constructs a set of average prices indexes at the three-digit product classification of the Standard International Trade Classification revision 3 using UNCTAD’s Commodity Price Statistics, interna¬tional and national sources, and UNCTAD secretariat estimates. This indicator is an index series where 2015=100.