Congo vs United Arab Emirates: Export unit value index
Export unit value index over time
- Congo
- United Arab Emirates
How they compare
Congo currently reports 138.5 2015 = 100 against 138.3 2015 = 100 in United Arab Emirates, a difference of 0.2 2015 = 100.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1980 it was United Arab Emirates ahead.
Congo ranks 88th and United Arab Emirates ranks 89th of 207 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 3 and United Arab Emirates in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | United Arab Emirates | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 35.56 2015 = 100 | 51.2 2015 = 100 | 15.64 2015 = 100 | United Arab Emirates |
| 2000s | 79.37 2015 = 100 | 78.53 2015 = 100 | 0.84 2015 = 100 | Congo |
| 2010s | 123.83 2015 = 100 | 117.03 2015 = 100 | 6.8 2015 = 100 | Congo |
| 2020s | 130.28 2015 = 100 | 130.24 2015 = 100 | 0.04 2015 = 100 | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher export unit value index, Congo or United Arab Emirates?
- Congo, at 138.5 2015 = 100 against 138.3 2015 = 100 in United Arab Emirates as of 2024.
- What is the difference in export unit value index between Congo and United Arab Emirates?
- 0.2 2015 = 100, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and United Arab Emirates?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2024.
- How do Congo and United Arab Emirates rank globally for export unit value index?
- Congo ranks 88th and United Arab Emirates ranks 89th of 207 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Handbook of Statistics and data files., UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), published as Export unit value index (2015 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Export unit value indices come from UNCTAD's trade database. Unit value indices are based on data reported by countries that demonstrate consistency under UNCTAD quality controls, supplemented by UNCTAD’s estimates using the previous year’s trade values at the Standard International Trade Classification three-digit level as weights. To improve data coverage, especially for the latest periods, UNCTAD constructs a set of average prices indexes at the three-digit product classification of the Standard International Trade Classification revision 3 using UNCTAD’s Commodity Price Statistics, interna¬tional and national sources, and UNCTAD secretariat estimates. This indicator is an index series where 2015=100.