Croatia vs Guinea-Bissau: Export unit value index (2015 = 100)
Export unit value index (2015 = 100) over time
- Croatia
- Guinea-Bissau
How they compare
Croatia currently reports 147.3 2015 = 100 against 145.7 2015 = 100 in Guinea-Bissau, a difference of 1.6 2015 = 100.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Guinea-Bissau ahead.
Croatia ranks 79th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 82nd of 208 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Croatia averaged higher in 2 and Guinea-Bissau in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Guinea-Bissau | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 90.42 2015 = 100 | 105.22 2015 = 100 | 14.8 2015 = 100 | Guinea-Bissau |
| 2010s | 113.92 2015 = 100 | 110.88 2015 = 100 | 3.04 2015 = 100 | Croatia |
| 2020s | 134.52 2015 = 100 | 134.35 2015 = 100 | 0.1667 2015 = 100 | Croatia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher export unit value index, Croatia or Guinea-Bissau?
- Croatia, at 147.3 2015 = 100 against 145.7 2015 = 100 in Guinea-Bissau as of 2025.
- What is the difference in export unit value index between Croatia and Guinea-Bissau?
- 1.6 2015 = 100, with Croatia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Guinea-Bissau?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Croatia and Guinea-Bissau rank globally for export unit value index?
- Croatia ranks 79th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 82nd of 208 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Handbook of Statistics and data files., UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), published as Export unit value index (2015 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Export unit value indices come from UNCTAD's trade database. Unit value indices are based on data reported by countries that demonstrate consistency under UNCTAD quality controls, supplemented by UNCTAD’s estimates using the previous year’s trade values at the Standard International Trade Classification three-digit level as weights. To improve data coverage, especially for the latest periods, UNCTAD constructs a set of average prices indexes at the three-digit product classification of the Standard International Trade Classification revision 3 using UNCTAD’s Commodity Price Statistics, interna¬tional and national sources, and UNCTAD secretariat estimates. This indicator is an index series where 2015=100.