Eritrea vs Faroe Islands: Export unit value index
Export unit value index over time
- Eritrea
- Faroe Islands
How they compare
Faroe Islands currently reports 123.7 2015 = 100 against 122.9 2015 = 100 in Eritrea, a difference of 0.8 2015 = 100.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Eritrea ahead.
Eritrea ranks 143rd and Faroe Islands ranks 141st of 207 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Eritrea averaged higher in 2 and Faroe Islands in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Faroe Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 107.06 2015 = 100 | 70.92 2015 = 100 | 36.14 2015 = 100 | Eritrea |
| 2010s | 114.34 2015 = 100 | 101.42 2015 = 100 | 12.92 2015 = 100 | Eritrea |
| 2020s | 115.12 2015 = 100 | 120.9 2015 = 100 | 5.78 2015 = 100 | Faroe Islands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher export unit value index, Eritrea or Faroe Islands?
- Faroe Islands, at 123.7 2015 = 100 against 122.9 2015 = 100 in Eritrea as of 2024.
- What is the difference in export unit value index between Eritrea and Faroe Islands?
- 0.8 2015 = 100, with Faroe Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Faroe Islands?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Eritrea and Faroe Islands rank globally for export unit value index?
- Eritrea ranks 143rd and Faroe Islands ranks 141st of 207 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Handbook of Statistics and data files., UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), published as Export unit value index (2015 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Export unit value indices come from UNCTAD's trade database. Unit value indices are based on data reported by countries that demonstrate consistency under UNCTAD quality controls, supplemented by UNCTAD’s estimates using the previous year’s trade values at the Standard International Trade Classification three-digit level as weights. To improve data coverage, especially for the latest periods, UNCTAD constructs a set of average prices indexes at the three-digit product classification of the Standard International Trade Classification revision 3 using UNCTAD’s Commodity Price Statistics, interna¬tional and national sources, and UNCTAD secretariat estimates. This indicator is an index series where 2015=100.