Eswatini vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Export unit value index
Export unit value index over time
- Eswatini
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
How they compare
Saint Kitts and Nevis currently reports 127.2 2015 = 100 against 127 2015 = 100 in Eswatini, a difference of 0.2 2015 = 100.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
Eswatini ranks 131st and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 130th of 207 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 2 and Saint Kitts and Nevis in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Saint Kitts and Nevis | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 78.15 2015 = 100 | 106.35 2015 = 100 | 28.2 2015 = 100 | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
| 2010s | 110.06 2015 = 100 | 108.78 2015 = 100 | 1.28 2015 = 100 | Eswatini |
| 2020s | 121.22 2015 = 100 | 120.24 2015 = 100 | 0.98 2015 = 100 | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher export unit value index, Eswatini or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- Saint Kitts and Nevis, at 127.2 2015 = 100 against 127 2015 = 100 in Eswatini as of 2024.
- What is the difference in export unit value index between Eswatini and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 0.2 2015 = 100, with Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Eswatini and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for export unit value index?
- Eswatini ranks 131st and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 130th of 207 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Handbook of Statistics and data files., UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), published as Export unit value index (2015 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Export unit value indices come from UNCTAD's trade database. Unit value indices are based on data reported by countries that demonstrate consistency under UNCTAD quality controls, supplemented by UNCTAD’s estimates using the previous year’s trade values at the Standard International Trade Classification three-digit level as weights. To improve data coverage, especially for the latest periods, UNCTAD constructs a set of average prices indexes at the three-digit product classification of the Standard International Trade Classification revision 3 using UNCTAD’s Commodity Price Statistics, interna¬tional and national sources, and UNCTAD secretariat estimates. This indicator is an index series where 2015=100.