Ethiopia vs Mozambique: Export unit value index (2015 = 100)
Export unit value index (2015 = 100) over time
- Ethiopia
- Mozambique
How they compare
Ethiopia currently reports 166.8 2015 = 100 against 164.8 2015 = 100 in Mozambique, a difference of 2 2015 = 100.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Mozambique ahead.
Ethiopia ranks 37th and Mozambique ranks 40th of 208 countries.
Mozambique has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia | Mozambique | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 64.91 2015 = 100 | 96.19 2015 = 100 | 31.28 2015 = 100 | Mozambique |
| 2000s | 66.33 2015 = 100 | 98.85 2015 = 100 | 32.52 2015 = 100 | Mozambique |
| 2010s | 106.03 2015 = 100 | 115.73 2015 = 100 | 9.7 2015 = 100 | Mozambique |
| 2020s | 132.28 2015 = 100 | 163.6 2015 = 100 | 31.32 2015 = 100 | Mozambique |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher export unit value index, Ethiopia or Mozambique?
- Ethiopia, at 166.8 2015 = 100 against 164.8 2015 = 100 in Mozambique as of 2025.
- What is the difference in export unit value index between Ethiopia and Mozambique?
- 2 2015 = 100, with Ethiopia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia and Mozambique?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2025.
- How do Ethiopia and Mozambique rank globally for export unit value index?
- Ethiopia ranks 37th and Mozambique ranks 40th of 208 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Handbook of Statistics and data files., UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), published as Export unit value index (2015 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Export unit value indices come from UNCTAD's trade database. Unit value indices are based on data reported by countries that demonstrate consistency under UNCTAD quality controls, supplemented by UNCTAD’s estimates using the previous year’s trade values at the Standard International Trade Classification three-digit level as weights. To improve data coverage, especially for the latest periods, UNCTAD constructs a set of average prices indexes at the three-digit product classification of the Standard International Trade Classification revision 3 using UNCTAD’s Commodity Price Statistics, interna¬tional and national sources, and UNCTAD secretariat estimates. This indicator is an index series where 2015=100.