Faroe Islands vs North Macedonia: Export unit value index
Export unit value index over time
- Faroe Islands
- North Macedonia
How they compare
Faroe Islands currently reports 123.7 2015 = 100 against 123.4 2015 = 100 in North Macedonia, a difference of 0.3 2015 = 100.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Faroe Islands ahead.
Faroe Islands ranks 141st and North Macedonia ranks 142nd of 207 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Faroe Islands averaged higher in 1 and North Macedonia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Faroe Islands | North Macedonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 70.92 2015 = 100 | 73.61 2015 = 100 | 2.69 2015 = 100 | North Macedonia |
| 2010s | 101.42 2015 = 100 | 105.39 2015 = 100 | 3.97 2015 = 100 | North Macedonia |
| 2020s | 120.9 2015 = 100 | 118.26 2015 = 100 | 2.64 2015 = 100 | Faroe Islands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher export unit value index, Faroe Islands or North Macedonia?
- Faroe Islands, at 123.7 2015 = 100 against 123.4 2015 = 100 in North Macedonia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in export unit value index between Faroe Islands and North Macedonia?
- 0.3 2015 = 100, with Faroe Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Faroe Islands and North Macedonia?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Faroe Islands and North Macedonia rank globally for export unit value index?
- Faroe Islands ranks 141st and North Macedonia ranks 142nd of 207 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Handbook of Statistics and data files., UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), published as Export unit value index (2015 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Export unit value indices come from UNCTAD's trade database. Unit value indices are based on data reported by countries that demonstrate consistency under UNCTAD quality controls, supplemented by UNCTAD’s estimates using the previous year’s trade values at the Standard International Trade Classification three-digit level as weights. To improve data coverage, especially for the latest periods, UNCTAD constructs a set of average prices indexes at the three-digit product classification of the Standard International Trade Classification revision 3 using UNCTAD’s Commodity Price Statistics, interna¬tional and national sources, and UNCTAD secretariat estimates. This indicator is an index series where 2015=100.