Guam vs Hong Kong: Export unit value index

Guam
130.4 2015 = 100
in 2024
Hong Kong
129.7 2015 = 100
in 2024
Guam rank
118th
Hong Kong rank
121st

Export unit value index over time

  • Guam
  • Hong Kong
5075100125150198020022024

How they compare

Guam currently reports 130.4 2015 = 100 against 129.7 2015 = 100 in Hong Kong, a difference of 0.7 2015 = 100.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Hong Kong ahead.

Guam ranks 118th and Hong Kong ranks 121st of 207 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Guam averaged higher in 2 and Hong Kong in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guam Hong Kong Difference Ahead
2000s 75.47 2015 = 100 79.97 2015 = 100 4.5 2015 = 100 Hong Kong
2010s 118.78 2015 = 100 99.35 2015 = 100 19.43 2015 = 100 Guam
2020s 128.54 2015 = 100 117.42 2015 = 100 11.12 2015 = 100 Guam

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher export unit value index, Guam or Hong Kong?
Guam, at 130.4 2015 = 100 against 129.7 2015 = 100 in Hong Kong as of 2024.
What is the difference in export unit value index between Guam and Hong Kong?
0.7 2015 = 100, with Guam ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guam and Hong Kong?
25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
How do Guam and Hong Kong rank globally for export unit value index?
Guam ranks 118th and Hong Kong ranks 121st of 207 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Handbook of Statistics and data files., UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), published as Export unit value index (2015 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Export unit value index (2015 = 100)
Unit
2015 = 100
Source
Handbook of Statistics and data files., UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
208 places, 6,926 data points, 1980–2024
Last refreshed

Export unit value indices come from UNCTAD's trade database. Unit value indices are based on data reported by countries that demonstrate consistency under UNCTAD quality controls, supplemented by UNCTAD’s estimates using the previous year’s trade values at the Standard International Trade Classification three-digit level as weights. To improve data coverage, especially for the latest periods, UNCTAD constructs a set of average prices indexes at the three-digit product classification of the Standard International Trade Classification revision 3 using UNCTAD’s Commodity Price Statistics, interna¬tional and national sources, and UNCTAD secretariat estimates. This indicator is an index series where 2015=100.