Jamaica vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Export unit value index
Export unit value index over time
- Jamaica
- Turks and Caicos Islands
How they compare
Turks and Caicos Islands currently reports 132 2015 = 100 against 130.9 2015 = 100 in Jamaica, a difference of 1.1 2015 = 100.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.
Jamaica ranks 115th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 114th of 207 countries.
Jamaica has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jamaica | Turks and Caicos Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 94.93 2015 = 100 | 85.79 2015 = 100 | 9.14 2015 = 100 | Jamaica |
| 2010s | 115.89 2015 = 100 | 100.58 2015 = 100 | 15.31 2015 = 100 | Jamaica |
| 2020s | 131.36 2015 = 100 | 121.04 2015 = 100 | 10.32 2015 = 100 | Jamaica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher export unit value index, Jamaica or Turks and Caicos Islands?
- Turks and Caicos Islands, at 132 2015 = 100 against 130.9 2015 = 100 in Jamaica as of 2024.
- What is the difference in export unit value index between Jamaica and Turks and Caicos Islands?
- 1.1 2015 = 100, with Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jamaica and Turks and Caicos Islands?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Jamaica and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for export unit value index?
- Jamaica ranks 115th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 114th of 207 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Handbook of Statistics and data files., UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), published as Export unit value index (2015 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Export unit value indices come from UNCTAD's trade database. Unit value indices are based on data reported by countries that demonstrate consistency under UNCTAD quality controls, supplemented by UNCTAD’s estimates using the previous year’s trade values at the Standard International Trade Classification three-digit level as weights. To improve data coverage, especially for the latest periods, UNCTAD constructs a set of average prices indexes at the three-digit product classification of the Standard International Trade Classification revision 3 using UNCTAD’s Commodity Price Statistics, interna¬tional and national sources, and UNCTAD secretariat estimates. This indicator is an index series where 2015=100.