Kenya vs North Macedonia: Export unit value index
Export unit value index over time
- Kenya
- North Macedonia
How they compare
North Macedonia currently reports 123.4 2015 = 100 against 122.8 2015 = 100 in Kenya, a difference of 0.6 2015 = 100.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Kenya ahead.
Kenya ranks 144th and North Macedonia ranks 142nd of 207 countries.
North Macedonia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kenya | North Macedonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 72.7 2015 = 100 | 73.61 2015 = 100 | 0.91 2015 = 100 | North Macedonia |
| 2010s | 102.05 2015 = 100 | 105.39 2015 = 100 | 3.34 2015 = 100 | North Macedonia |
| 2020s | 113.88 2015 = 100 | 118.26 2015 = 100 | 4.38 2015 = 100 | North Macedonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher export unit value index, Kenya or North Macedonia?
- North Macedonia, at 123.4 2015 = 100 against 122.8 2015 = 100 in Kenya as of 2024.
- What is the difference in export unit value index between Kenya and North Macedonia?
- 0.6 2015 = 100, with North Macedonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kenya and North Macedonia?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Kenya and North Macedonia rank globally for export unit value index?
- Kenya ranks 144th and North Macedonia ranks 142nd of 207 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Handbook of Statistics and data files., UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), published as Export unit value index (2015 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Export unit value indices come from UNCTAD's trade database. Unit value indices are based on data reported by countries that demonstrate consistency under UNCTAD quality controls, supplemented by UNCTAD’s estimates using the previous year’s trade values at the Standard International Trade Classification three-digit level as weights. To improve data coverage, especially for the latest periods, UNCTAD constructs a set of average prices indexes at the three-digit product classification of the Standard International Trade Classification revision 3 using UNCTAD’s Commodity Price Statistics, interna¬tional and national sources, and UNCTAD secretariat estimates. This indicator is an index series where 2015=100.