Kiribati vs Sudan: Export unit value index
Export unit value index over time
- Kiribati
- Sudan
How they compare
Kiribati currently reports 127.8 2015 = 100 against 127.3 2015 = 100 in Sudan, a difference of 0.5 2015 = 100.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Kiribati ahead.
Kiribati ranks 128th and Sudan ranks 129th of 207 countries.
Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 82.26 2015 = 100 | 95.22 2015 = 100 | 12.96 2015 = 100 | Sudan |
| 2010s | 103.06 2015 = 100 | 123.45 2015 = 100 | 20.39 2015 = 100 | Sudan |
| 2020s | 123.9 2015 = 100 | 125.5 2015 = 100 | 1.6 2015 = 100 | Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher export unit value index, Kiribati or Sudan?
- Kiribati, at 127.8 2015 = 100 against 127.3 2015 = 100 in Sudan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in export unit value index between Kiribati and Sudan?
- 0.5 2015 = 100, with Kiribati ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Sudan?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
- How do Kiribati and Sudan rank globally for export unit value index?
- Kiribati ranks 128th and Sudan ranks 129th of 207 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Handbook of Statistics and data files., UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), published as Export unit value index (2015 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Export unit value indices come from UNCTAD's trade database. Unit value indices are based on data reported by countries that demonstrate consistency under UNCTAD quality controls, supplemented by UNCTAD’s estimates using the previous year’s trade values at the Standard International Trade Classification three-digit level as weights. To improve data coverage, especially for the latest periods, UNCTAD constructs a set of average prices indexes at the three-digit product classification of the Standard International Trade Classification revision 3 using UNCTAD’s Commodity Price Statistics, interna¬tional and national sources, and UNCTAD secretariat estimates. This indicator is an index series where 2015=100.