Kyrgyzstan vs Papua New Guinea: Export unit value index (2015 = 100)
Export unit value index (2015 = 100) over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
Papua New Guinea currently reports 197.7 2015 = 100 against 197 2015 = 100 in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 0.7 2015 = 100.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 12th and Papua New Guinea ranks 11th of 208 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Kyrgyzstan averaged higher in 1 and Papua New Guinea in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Papua New Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 67.76 2015 = 100 | 66.43 2015 = 100 | 1.33 2015 = 100 | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2010s | 111.98 2015 = 100 | 118.41 2015 = 100 | 6.43 2015 = 100 | Papua New Guinea |
| 2020s | 149.72 2015 = 100 | 173.85 2015 = 100 | 24.13 2015 = 100 | Papua New Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher export unit value index, Kyrgyzstan or Papua New Guinea?
- Papua New Guinea, at 197.7 2015 = 100 against 197 2015 = 100 in Kyrgyzstan as of 2025.
- What is the difference in export unit value index between Kyrgyzstan and Papua New Guinea?
- 0.7 2015 = 100, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Papua New Guinea?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Papua New Guinea rank globally for export unit value index?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 12th and Papua New Guinea ranks 11th of 208 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Handbook of Statistics and data files., UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), published as Export unit value index (2015 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Export unit value indices come from UNCTAD's trade database. Unit value indices are based on data reported by countries that demonstrate consistency under UNCTAD quality controls, supplemented by UNCTAD’s estimates using the previous year’s trade values at the Standard International Trade Classification three-digit level as weights. To improve data coverage, especially for the latest periods, UNCTAD constructs a set of average prices indexes at the three-digit product classification of the Standard International Trade Classification revision 3 using UNCTAD’s Commodity Price Statistics, interna¬tional and national sources, and UNCTAD secretariat estimates. This indicator is an index series where 2015=100.