Latvia vs Trinidad and Tobago: Export unit value index
Export unit value index over time
- Latvia
- Trinidad and Tobago
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 150.7 2015 = 100 against 150.5 2015 = 100 in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 0.2 2015 = 100.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
Latvia ranks 51st and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 53rd of 207 countries.
Trinidad and Tobago has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Trinidad and Tobago | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 79.99 2015 = 100 | 90.28 2015 = 100 | 10.29 2015 = 100 | Trinidad and Tobago |
| 2010s | 111.59 2015 = 100 | 117.69 2015 = 100 | 6.1 2015 = 100 | Trinidad and Tobago |
| 2020s | 141.54 2015 = 100 | 154.06 2015 = 100 | 12.52 2015 = 100 | Trinidad and Tobago |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher export unit value index, Latvia or Trinidad and Tobago?
- Latvia, at 150.7 2015 = 100 against 150.5 2015 = 100 in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2024.
- What is the difference in export unit value index between Latvia and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 0.2 2015 = 100, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Latvia and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for export unit value index?
- Latvia ranks 51st and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 53rd of 207 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Handbook of Statistics and data files., UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), published as Export unit value index (2015 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Export unit value indices come from UNCTAD's trade database. Unit value indices are based on data reported by countries that demonstrate consistency under UNCTAD quality controls, supplemented by UNCTAD’s estimates using the previous year’s trade values at the Standard International Trade Classification three-digit level as weights. To improve data coverage, especially for the latest periods, UNCTAD constructs a set of average prices indexes at the three-digit product classification of the Standard International Trade Classification revision 3 using UNCTAD’s Commodity Price Statistics, interna¬tional and national sources, and UNCTAD secretariat estimates. This indicator is an index series where 2015=100.