Liberia vs Papua New Guinea: Export unit value index (2015 = 100)
Export unit value index (2015 = 100) over time
- Liberia
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
Liberia currently reports 201.9 2015 = 100 against 197.7 2015 = 100 in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 4.2 2015 = 100.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Liberia ahead.
Liberia ranks 9th and Papua New Guinea ranks 11th of 208 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Liberia averaged higher in 2 and Papua New Guinea in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Liberia | Papua New Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 106.69 2015 = 100 | 10.82 2015 = 100 | 95.86 2015 = 100 | Liberia |
| 2000s | 105.3 2015 = 100 | 66.43 2015 = 100 | 38.87 2015 = 100 | Liberia |
| 2010s | 116.33 2015 = 100 | 118.41 2015 = 100 | 2.08 2015 = 100 | Papua New Guinea |
| 2020s | 156.62 2015 = 100 | 173.85 2015 = 100 | 17.23 2015 = 100 | Papua New Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher export unit value index, Liberia or Papua New Guinea?
- Liberia, at 201.9 2015 = 100 against 197.7 2015 = 100 in Papua New Guinea as of 2025.
- What is the difference in export unit value index between Liberia and Papua New Guinea?
- 4.2 2015 = 100, with Liberia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Liberia and Papua New Guinea?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2025.
- How do Liberia and Papua New Guinea rank globally for export unit value index?
- Liberia ranks 9th and Papua New Guinea ranks 11th of 208 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Handbook of Statistics and data files., UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), published as Export unit value index (2015 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Export unit value indices come from UNCTAD's trade database. Unit value indices are based on data reported by countries that demonstrate consistency under UNCTAD quality controls, supplemented by UNCTAD’s estimates using the previous year’s trade values at the Standard International Trade Classification three-digit level as weights. To improve data coverage, especially for the latest periods, UNCTAD constructs a set of average prices indexes at the three-digit product classification of the Standard International Trade Classification revision 3 using UNCTAD’s Commodity Price Statistics, interna¬tional and national sources, and UNCTAD secretariat estimates. This indicator is an index series where 2015=100.